Old ones, and I wanted to do it for all my different camera models.
#Reikan focal vs lensalign pro#
I needed to find out first if the newįirmware fixed the issue of the different parameter requirements for theīaseline to see how different my new Optimization Pro setting would be from my I began my testing with a very methodical approach. Other bodies, but never ALL my camera bodies at once. This meant my lens was either “set up” to work with my 1D bodies, or my Parameter settings for the 1D Mark III and 1D Mark IV compared to Canon’s other Second, the lens required completely different Optimization Pro focus
#Reikan focal vs lensalign software#
Software being perfectly calibrated using the USB dock, on the 1D Mark III and Mark IV the lens would badly front-focus Sixteen adjustable focus points available in the Sigma Optimization Pro
The red rectangles are the AF Assist points active with the center point in AI Servo AF mode if Custom Function III-07 is enabled.Ī chart for the Canon EOS 7D showing the position of the focus points in the viewfinder with an identifying number next to each (top), a map of the focus array sensor (middle right), a chart identifying which strip in the array is associated with each focus point in the viewfinder as numbered in the top diagram (middle left), and the actual coverage area of each focus point as seen through the viewfinder (bottom).Briefly recap, my issue with the lens and original Version 1.00 firmware was The larger blue rectangles are the actual coverage area for each of those points. The dark black rectangles, along with the spot metering circle, are all that appear in the viewfinder. The area of sensitivity for most focus points in most configurations are much larger than the indicators seen through the viewfinder.Ī map of the EOS 5D mark II focus system. Other AF systems in modern DSLRs are similar. Even when a camera/lens combo is adjusted just as well or even better than with the LensAlign system, minor flaws will be visible in the test pictures of a flat target.Īppendix: Maps of two focus systems with which I am personally very familiar. The flat target methods will reveal every minor flaw. I think one reason many people like the LensAlign system better is that when a body/lens combo is dialed in the shots of that test target will look very good and the user will feel confident the camera is in adjustment. Both will improve your AF accuracy if the original body/lens combo is off by more than 3-5 AFMA adjustment points. Then tape your test target to the mirror with the center of the target on the spot your camera is already pointing at.īoth methods have their strengths and weaknesses. The easiest way to do this is to choose a sturdy, undistorted wall mounted mirror and adjust the camera position until the Center Focus Point is aimed at the center of the camera's lens in the reflection. Even if you are not using the FoCal software, to use a flat target it must be aligned.
It has a module that assists you with getting your camera and target aligned. The FoCal method uses a flat target which must be in a parallel plane with the camera's sensor. Even cameras that don't have "hidden" focus points may not be very accurate in terms of having the focus array aimed at the exact spot indicated in the viewfinder. The location of these six AF Assist Points are not indicated in the viewfinder! Yet the camera may be using one of them pointed at something other than the flat part of the test target when it decides the focus distance. When shooting in AI Servo AF, if C.Fn III-07 is enabled, there are six small AF Assist Points clustered within the spot metering circle that are active in addition to the Center Focus Point. For this reason I prefer to use AF adjustment methods that use a flat target.Ĭonsider the Canon 5DMkII, for example. If the center focus point on the focus screen does not accurately indicate the exact point aimed at by the focus array this can be problematic.
0 kommentar(er)
